County of Stettler denies request for security deposit refund of building

ECA Review/File
Written by Stu Salkeld

County of Stettler council denied a request from a ratepayer to refund a security deposit held against the building of an approach. 

The decision was made at the Jan. 13 regular meeting of council, held via YouTube to meet pandemic rules.

Councillors read a report filed by Rich Fitzgerald, the county’s geographic information system (GIS) coordinator, stating a ratepayer was requesting a $2,000 security deposit dating back almost 10 years be refunded to him.

“A subdivision application to create an approximately 4-acre panhandle configured bare parcel on the SW 19-34-20-W4M was approved by the Municipal Planning Commission on March 13, 2012,” stated Fitzgerald in his report.

“In order to proceed with the registration of the subdivided parcel, the County required the landowner to provide a $2,000 security deposit to ensure an approach was constructed off Scollard Road in compliance with the County’s approach specifications at a later date. 

“Since the registration of the parcel, no approach has been constructed, nor has a rural address been assigned/requested for the residence.

“The applicant is currently using an undeveloped road allowance for access to his residence and has indicated he does not intend to construct an approach for access to his property from Scollard Road.

“This poses several issues. A rural address cannot be assigned from an undeveloped road allowance, and the road is not built to county standard, nor is it maintained by the county. 

“Due to the subdivision being endorsed prior to the approach being constructed, the county took the security deposit to ensure the county would have the funds available to construct the approach should the landowner fail to do so.”

Coun. James Nibourg stated it appears there’s a fence running through the middle of the approach and wondered how public works was going to handle this. 

“I don’t want to put staff in that position if we don’t have to,” said Nibourg.

Director of Operations Rick Green stated the fence shouldn’t be a problem if the county has to build the approach, and further noted he ensures county staff take many photos of the site in question before work begins so there’s no question later about what was done.

Coun. Les Stulberg asked if $2,000 was going to be enough money to cover construction of the approach.

Green stated yes, based on the estimate.

Fitzgerald also noted in his report if the approach costs less than $2,000 to build, the surplus funds will be returned to the ratepayer.

Coun. Ernie Gendre asked if a 911 call comes in from that property and an ambulance gets stuck in that approach, who is liable? 

Green answered that building the proper approach will get rid of liability.

Councillors unanimously approved a motion for staff to inform the landowner of Lot 1, Block 1, Plan 1212174 that they must construct their approach per the conditions of the subdivision approval by April 30, 2021, failing which the county will undertake the work at the landowner’s expense.


Stu Salkeld, Local Journalism Initiative reporter

ECA Review

About the author

Stu Salkeld

Stu Salkeld, who has upwards of 28 years of experience in the Alberta community newspaper industry, is now covering councils and other news in the Stettler region and has experience working in the area as well.

He has joined the ECA Review as a Local Journalism Initiative Journalist.

Stu earned his two-year diploma in print journalism from SAIT in Calgary from 1993 to ’95 and was raised in Oyen, Alta., one of the communities within the ECA Review’s coverage area.